Archive for the '2.0 Politics' Category

Organisations and blogging

BTH - Blogger More and more organisations are thinking about web 2.0. Blogging has been viewed both as a way of promoting an organization as well as unnecessary and time consuming. I guess that depends on the organisation and the blogger - and the situation as a whole. For some organisations promotion is one of the core areas. A University, for example, is driven by promotion. Promotion leads to new students, new researchers, new possibilities.

One of the problems is that universities and similar organisations have a graphic profile and do not want to be connected to blogging services as Wordpress.com or Blogger. On the other hand, they do not want common things like blogs in their fine publishing systems. Of course, this is a case of ignorance.

I know for a fact that some research bloggers would not like to be internalised in the universities publishing profile. My own blogging has to this day been done outside normal working ours, so I haven’t reflected on it.

But lately my thoughts have wandered in the direction of viewing blogging as a normal research activity. Blogging is a way of reaching outside your normal context. And for universities it would be a chance of promoting the research and experience of their researchers - and other staff too.

It could be done like this: Do you see the graphic in this post? View it as a stamp. It should be an official graphic following the organisation’s graphic profile - this was done quickly by myself in Photoshop as an example of how it could look like. The graphic could be placed in the sidebar and linked to a page at the university web site, where all their bloggers are listed and presented.

2.0 as a Generative Force

Jeff De Cagna at principledinnovation.com argues that “Web 2.0 is precisely the generative force associations need to embrace to enable the creation of new value in the 21st century”. Well spoken. 2.0 processes could be a generative force in more in more situations than we normally give it credit for. Why are we so scared of this force when it could raise the quality in most knowledge processes? Is it only about loosing control, loosing the power over people? Loosing our selves in the crowd?

But if my knowledge- and communication processes could be boosted by 2.0, why wouldn’t I embrace it? Are we so eager to have control and accumulate power that we are willing to sell out things like knowledge- and communication quality.

Is it self-evident that 2.0 processes will lead to higher quality regarding knowledge processes and communication. No, not at all. It is not possible to generalise a question like this. But a large amount of the hierarchical, closed processes we normally engage in, would benefit from a 2.0 perspective.




Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 LicenseThis site use Dublin Core metadataget ZoteroAdd to Technorati FavoritesAcademics Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog DirectoryBlog Directory & Search engine